Mention rollback limitations #93692
Mention rollback limitations #93692
Conversation
Due to the database major version upgrade, we can't rollback using the regular procedure.
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/XS
|
🤖 Thu May 22 12:56:06 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://93692--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-acs/latest/upgrading/upgrade-operator.html |
|
@erthalion: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
kcarmichael08
added
the
peer-review-in-progress
kcarmichael08
left a comment
kcarmichael08
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
one question; otherwise lgtm!
| ==== | ||
| If you are rolling back from {product-title-short} 4.0, you can only rollback to the latest patch release version of {product-title-short} 3.74. | ||
| If you are rolling back from {product-title-short} 4.8 or newer, you can only rollback to the latest patch release version of {product-title-short} 4.8. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| If you are rolling back from {product-title-short} 4.8 or newer, you can only rollback to the latest patch release version of {product-title-short} 4.8. | |
| If you are rolling back from {product-title-short} 4.8 or newer, you can only roll back to the latest patch release version of {product-title-short} 4.8. |
I know this is in the existing text, but can we fix it? Should be 2 words.
kcarmichael08
added
peer-review-done
|
Thank you @erthalion @kcarmichael08 I am closing this in favor of #93890. I have included this bit in that PR. |
4 participants
Due to the database major version upgrade, we can't rollback using the regular procedure.
Version(s): 4.8+
Issue
Link to docs preview: https://93692--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-acs/latest/upgrading/upgrade-operator.html
QE review:
Additional information: