-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
OSDOCS-15203:CQA for associating secondary metrics #97356
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@JoeAldinger: This pull request references OSDOCS-15203 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@JoeAldinger: This pull request references OSDOCS-15203 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
🤖 Mon Aug 11 17:37:08 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
7ac1ef0 to
ab3bd81
Compare
ab3bd81 to
a0553e7
Compare
|
@JoeAldinger: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/lgtm As per Joe, it is reorganization PR. |
|
@JoeAldinger: This pull request references OSDOCS-15203 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
@JoeAldinger: This pull request references OSDOCS-15203 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
jab-rh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JoeAldinger, left a few minor comments, but doesn't prevent getting it merged.
| * Pod namespace | ||
| * Interface name (such as `eth0`) | ||
|
|
||
| These metrics work well until new interfaces are added to the pod, for example via https://github.com/intel/multus-cni[Multus], as it is not clear what the interface names refer to. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JoeAldinger, historically we've needed permission for linking to GitHub as I recall.
|
|
||
| :_mod-docs-content-type: CONCEPT | ||
| [id="cnf-network-metrics-daemon_{context}"] | ||
| = Network Metrics Daemon |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we actually capitalize Daemon for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think in this case it does get capitalize 🤷🏻 https://github.com/openshift/network-metrics-daemon.
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20 |
|
@JoeAldinger: #97356 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16 |
|
@JoeAldinger: new pull request created: #99073 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@JoeAldinger: new pull request created: #99074 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
|
@JoeAldinger: new pull request created: #99075 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.13 |
|
@JoeAldinger: new pull request created: #99076 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.12 |
|
@JoeAldinger: new pull request created: #99077 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@JoeAldinger: new pull request created: #99078 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@JoeAldinger: new pull request created: #99079 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@JoeAldinger: new pull request created: #99080 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@JoeAldinger: #97356 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Version(s):
4.12+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15224
Link to docs preview:
QE review:
Additional information: