OSDOCS#15307: adds file name for CA bundle to ingress MicroShift

[ShaunaDiaz]

Version(s):
4.19+

Issue:
OSDOCS-15307

Link to docs preview:
microshift-ingress-control-config

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-15307 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.19+

Issue:
OSDOCS-15307

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Tue Aug 12 11:54:48 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://97430--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_configuring/microshift-ingress-controller.html

[openshift-ci]

@ShaunaDiaz: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-15307 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.19+

Issue:
OSDOCS-15307

Link to docs preview:
microshift-ingress-control-config

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[pacevedom]

/lgtm

[agullon]

/lgtm form QE

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-15307 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.19+

Issue:
OSDOCS-15307

Link to docs preview:
microshift-ingress-control-config

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.19+

Issue:
OSDOCS-15307

Link to docs preview:
microshift-ingress-control-config

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[xenolinux]

Looks great!

Merging

[xenolinux]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

[xenolinux]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@xenolinux: #97430 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.19":

Applying: OSDOCS-15307: adds file name for CA bundle to ingress MicroShift
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/microshift-ingress-controller-config.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/microshift-ingress-controller-config.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/microshift-ingress-controller-config.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OSDOCS-15307: adds file name for CA bundle to ingress MicroShift

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@xenolinux: new pull request created: #97596

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[xenolinux]

@xenolinux: #97430 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.19":

Applying: [OSDOCS-15307](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OSDOCS-15307): adds file name for CA bundle to ingress MicroShift
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/microshift-ingress-controller-config.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/microshift-ingress-controller-config.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/microshift-ingress-controller-config.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 [OSDOCS-15307](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OSDOCS-15307): adds file name for CA bundle to ingress MicroShift

@ShaunaDiaz conflicts! need a manual CP PR :(