Skip to content

Conversation

@xiaojiey
Copy link
Contributor

@xiaojiey xiaojiey commented Sep 2, 2025

… are cluster wide now

Version(s):

SPOv0.9.0

Issue:

In PR kubernetes-sigs/security-profiles-operator#2735, the security profiles CRDs scope has been updated to cluster wide. In this PR, the security profiles related commands are updated accordingly.

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 2, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 2, 2025

@xiaojiey: This pull request references OSDOCS-15847 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

…s are cluster wide now

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 2, 2025
@xiaojiey xiaojiey changed the title OSDOCS-15847: Update seccompprofile and seclinuxprofile related commands as both CR… CMP-3405: Update seccompprofile and seclinuxprofile related commands as both CR… Sep 2, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 2, 2025

@xiaojiey: This pull request references CMP-3405 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

…s are cluster wide now

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 2, 2025

@xiaojiey: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 2, 2025

@xiaojiey: This pull request references CMP-3405 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

…s are cluster wide now

Version(s):

SPOv0.9.0
Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

In PR kubernetes-sigs/security-profiles-operator#2735, the security profiles CRDs scope has been updated to cluster wide. In this PR, the security profiles related commands are updated accordingly.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 2, 2025

@xiaojiey: This pull request references CMP-3405 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

…s are cluster wide now

Version(s):

SPOv0.9.0

Issue:

In PR kubernetes-sigs/security-profiles-operator#2735, the security profiles CRDs scope has been updated to cluster wide. In this PR, the security profiles related commands are updated accordingly.

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@xiaojiey xiaojiey changed the title CMP-3405: Update seccompprofile and seclinuxprofile related commands as both CR… CMP-3405: Update seccompprofile and seclinuxprofile related commands as both CRD scope… Sep 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 3, 2025

@xiaojiey: This pull request references CMP-3405 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

… are cluster wide now

Version(s):

SPOv0.9.0

Issue:

In PR kubernetes-sigs/security-profiles-operator#2735, the security profiles CRDs scope has been updated to cluster wide. In this PR, the security profiles related commands are updated accordingly.

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@xiaojiey
Copy link
Contributor Author

xiaojiey commented Sep 3, 2025

@yuumasato @rhmdnd @Vincent056 @Anna-Koudelkova Could you please help to review? Thanks.

@Anna-Koudelkova
Copy link

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Sep 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 9, 2025

@xiaojiey: This pull request references CMP-3405 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

… are cluster wide now

Version(s):

SPOv0.9.0

Issue:

In PR kubernetes-sigs/security-profiles-operator#2735, the security profiles CRDs scope has been updated to cluster wide. In this PR, the security profiles related commands are updated accordingly.

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@yuumasato yuumasato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 10, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 11, 2025

@xiaojiey: This pull request references CMP-3405 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

… are cluster wide now

Version(s):

SPOv0.9.0

Issue:

In PR kubernetes-sigs/security-profiles-operator#2735, the security profiles CRDs scope has been updated to cluster wide. In this PR, the security profiles related commands are updated accordingly.

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bscott-rh bscott-rh added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Sep 15, 2025
@bscott-rh
Copy link
Contributor

Cherrypicking to 4.14+ per James Brigman in Slack.

@bscott-rh bscott-rh merged commit 6ccf6f4 into openshift:main Sep 15, 2025
2 checks passed
@bscott-rh
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bscott-rh: new pull request created: #99084

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bscott-rh: new pull request created: #99085

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bscott-rh: new pull request created: #99086

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bscott-rh: new pull request created: #99087

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bscott-rh: new pull request created: #99088

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bscott-rh: new pull request created: #99089

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bscott-rh: new pull request created: #99090

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 branch/enterprise-4.20 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants