-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
CNV-67472: Clean up docs structure before adding new content #98372
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@abrennan89: This pull request references CNV-67472 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
🤖 Thu Sep 04 14:47:00 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://98372--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/ |
@abrennan89: This pull request references CNV-67472 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks @abrennan89!
17c78d9
to
17eba91
Compare
17eba91
to
fa95684
Compare
@abrennan89: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.12 |
LGTM |
@dfitzmau: #98372 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20 |
@abrennan89: #98372 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.14":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@abrennan89: #98372 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.16":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@abrennan89: #98372 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.17":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@abrennan89: #98372 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.18":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@abrennan89: new pull request created: #98545 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@abrennan89: #98372 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.19":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Changes will need to be applied to older branches manually since the DPDK checkup was removed for 4.20 and other differences in the branches are causing conflicts |
Version(s):
4.14, 4.16+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-67472
Link to docs preview:
https://98372--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/virt/monitoring/virt-running-cluster-checkups.html
QE review:
N/A, docs structural changes only.
Additional information:
Currently, the structure of the cluster checkup virt docs is by web console vs. CLI rather than use case, which makes it hard for users to see what content is relevant to the JTBD. This PR fixes that before #98207 can be applied to add additional troubleshooting steps to one of the jobs (storage checkup).