Skip to content

Conversation

tedaveryredhat
Copy link

@tedaveryredhat tedaveryredhat commented Sep 9, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 9, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-14897 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.20

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14897

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 9, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Sep 9, 2025

🤖 Tue Sep 16 20:09:02 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://98728--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_release_notes/microshift-4-20-release-notes.html

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 9, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-14897 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.20

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14897

Link to docs preview:
https://98728--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_release_notes/microshift-4-20-release-notes.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@tedaveryredhat tedaveryredhat force-pushed the OSDOCS-14897 branch 2 times, most recently from 3b54c81 to 4e805e2 Compare September 10, 2025 20:40
@tedaveryredhat tedaveryredhat changed the title OSDOCS-14897:Add GDP feature to release notes (WIP) OSDOCS-14897:Add GDP feature to release notes Sep 11, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 11, 2025
@eslutsky
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 15, 2025
//== Technology Preview features

//Some features in this release are currently in Technology Preview. These experimental features are not intended for production use. Note the following scope of support on the Red{nbsp}Hat Customer Portal for these features:
=== Generic Device Plugin Technology Preview feature

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we are already listing this under Technology preview features should not adding just Generic Device Plugin is sufficient here ?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi. I'm not sure I understand your comment. Are you suggesting that the heading needs to be "Generic Device Plugin feature" after removing "Technology Preview"?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, as i think it is already listed under Technology Preview Features i am wondering if we also need Technology preview along with the feature title. hope that clarifies it.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 16, 2025
link:https://access.redhat.com/support/offerings/techpreview[Technology Preview Features Support Scope]

//Some features in this release are currently in Technology Preview. These experimental features are not intended for production use. Note the following scope of support on the Red{nbsp}Hat Customer Portal for these features:
[id="microshift-4-20-Generic-Device-Plugin_{context}]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 [error] AsciiDoc.ClosedIdQuotes: Quoted ID value is not closed.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 16, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kasturinarra
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 17, 2025
@tedaveryredhat tedaveryredhat changed the title (WIP) OSDOCS-14897:Add GDP feature to release notes OSDOCS-14897:Add GDP feature to release notes Sep 17, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 17, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-14897 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.20

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14897

Link to docs preview:
https://98728--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_release_notes/microshift-4-20-release-notes.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@tedaveryredhat
Copy link
Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Sep 17, 2025
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz removed the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Sep 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz merged commit 65a361e into openshift:enterprise-4.20 Sep 17, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants