OSDOCS-16088: adds warning about images power loss #99003
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-16088 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/S
|
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-16088 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-16088 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
ShaunaDiaz
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-16088
branch
from
bc6fe9b to
61153b0
Compare
|
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-16088 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-16088 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
ShaunaDiaz
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-16088
branch
from
61153b0 to
72507e0
Compare
ShaunaDiaz
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-16088
branch
from
72507e0 to
d036725
Compare
ShaunaDiaz
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-16088
branch
from
d036725 to
4a69eb6
Compare
|
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-16088 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
ShaunaDiaz
added
the
merge-review-needed
ShaunaDiaz
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-16088
branch
from
4a69eb6 to
064be26
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
@ShaunaDiaz: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
dfitzmau
removed
the
merge-review-needed
dfitzmau
added
peer-review-in-progress
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
|
@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #99865 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #99866 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
8 participants
Version(s):
4.19+
Issue:
OSDOCS-16088
Link to docs preview:
https://99003--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_install_bootc/microshift-about-rhel-image-mode.html#microshift-preparing-for-image-building_microshift-about-rhel-image-mode
https://99003--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_install_rpm_ostree/microshift-embed-in-rpm-ostree-offline-use.html
QE review: