OSDOCS-161612:adds Layer2 EIP limitations for UDN

[JoeAldinger]

Version(s):
4.18+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16162

Link to docs preview:
https://99162--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/networking/multiple_networks/primary_networks/about-user-defined-networks.html#limitations-for-udn_about-user-defined-networks:~:text=Layer2%20egress%20IP%20limitations%3A

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.
• SME has approved this change.

Additional information:

[openshift-ci-robot]

@JoeAldinger: No Jira issue with key OSDOCS-161612 exists in the tracker at https://issues.redhat.com/.
Once a valid jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request, request a refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.18+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16162

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Mon Sep 22 14:24:33 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://99162--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/networking/multiple_networks/primary_networks/about-user-defined-networks.html

[openshift-ci-robot]

@JoeAldinger: No Jira issue with key OSDOCS-161612 exists in the tracker at https://issues.redhat.com/.
Once a valid jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request, request a refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.18+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16162

Link to docs preview:
https://99162--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/networking/multiple_networks/primary_networks/about-user-defined-networks.html#limitations-for-udn_about-user-defined-networks:~:text=Layer2%20egress%20IP%20limitations%3A

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[anuragthehatter]

/assign @huiran0826 Can you help taking a look? Thanks

[huiran0826]

/lgtm

[martinkennelly]

/lgtm

just one nit but up to you

[openshift-ci]

@JoeAldinger: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@JoeAldinger: No Jira issue with key OSDOCS-161612 exists in the tracker at https://issues.redhat.com/.
Once a valid jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request, request a refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.18+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16162

Link to docs preview:
https://99162--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/networking/multiple_networks/primary_networks/about-user-defined-networks.html#limitations-for-udn_about-user-defined-networks:~:text=Layer2%20egress%20IP%20limitations%3A

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@JoeAldinger: No Jira issue with key OSDOCS-161612 exists in the tracker at https://issues.redhat.com/.
Once a valid jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request, request a refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.18+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16162

Link to docs preview:
https://99162--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/networking/multiple_networks/primary_networks/about-user-defined-networks.html#limitations-for-udn_about-user-defined-networks:~:text=Layer2%20egress%20IP%20limitations%3A

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.
• SME has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@JoeAldinger: No Jira issue with key OSDOCS-161612 exists in the tracker at https://issues.redhat.com/.
Once a valid jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request, request a refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.18+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16162

Link to docs preview:
https://99162--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/networking/multiple_networks/primary_networks/about-user-defined-networks.html#limitations-for-udn_about-user-defined-networks:~:text=Layer2%20egress%20IP%20limitations%3A

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.
• SME has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[bergerhoffer]

/label merge-review-in-progress

[bergerhoffer]

Merge review LGTM!

[JoeAldinger]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

[JoeAldinger]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@JoeAldinger: new pull request created: #99572

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@JoeAldinger: new pull request created: #99573

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[bscott-rh]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@bscott-rh: new pull request created: #101247

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[bscott-rh]

Resolved the enterprise-4.21 conflict in #101246 without needing to do an additional cherrypick.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@JoeAldinger: #99162 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.21":

Applying: OSDOCS-161612:adds Layer2 EIP limitations for UDN
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/nw-udn-limitations.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/nw-udn-limitations.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/nw-udn-limitations.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OSDOCS-161612:adds Layer2 EIP limitations for UDN

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.