-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
OSDOCS-14501: Prune Operators #99307
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@jneczypor: This pull request references OSDOCS-14501 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
1 similar comment
|
@jneczypor: This pull request references OSDOCS-14501 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
🤖 Fri Sep 26 19:15:21 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
|
/retest |
|
@jneczypor: This pull request references OSDOCS-14501 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest |
5e695ce to
c985a8b
Compare
45cb231 to
4b8b38f
Compare
|
@jneczypor: This pull request references OSDOCS-14501 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@jneczypor /lgtm. Just had a few suggestions- great work! |
4b8b38f to
6be0f9a
Compare
|
/retest |
6be0f9a to
ecaf1fb
Compare
51bc0fa to
a9aeae8
Compare
|
@jneczypor: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/lgtm |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
|
@mletalie: #99307 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.19": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
|
@mletalie: #99307 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.19": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |



OSDOCS-14501: Prune Operators
Version(s):
4.19+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14501
Link to docs preview:
HCP: https://99307--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa-hcp/latest/operators/
Classic: https://99307--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/operators/
QE review:
No QE needed
Additional information: