OSDOCS-13110: Update PatternFly guidelines for PF6 in OCP content

[jseseCCS]

Version(s): Fix version 4.20

Issue: OSDOCS-13110

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information: I made changes to this topic: 7.1.4 PatternFly guidelines

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jseseCCS: This pull request references OSDOCS-13110 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead.

In response to this:

Version(s): Fix version 4.20

Issue: OSDOCS-13110

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information: I made changes to this topic: 7.1.4 PatternFly guidelines
.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jseseCCS: This pull request references OSDOCS-13110 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead.

In response to this:

Version(s): Fix version 4.20

Issue: OSDOCS-13110

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information: I made changes to this topic: 7.1.4 PatternFly guidelines

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@jseseCCS: The label(s) /label peer-review-needed cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cloud-experts, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, ok-to-test, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, sme-review-done, sme-review-needed, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/label peer-review-needed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-ci]

Hi @jseseCCS. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[jhadvig]

/lgtm

[jhadvig]

/ok-to-test

[jseseCCS]

/merge-review-needed

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Tue Oct 14 12:32:48 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://99660--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-dedicated/latest/web_console/dynamic-plugin/overview-dynamic-plugin.html
https://99660--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/web_console/dynamic-plugin/overview-dynamic-plugin.html
https://99660--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa-hcp/latest/web_console/dynamic-plugin/overview-dynamic-plugin.html
https://99660--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/web_console/dynamic-plugin/overview-dynamic-plugin.html

[jseseCCS]

@jhadvig what do i need to do to merge this?

[jseseCCS]

@yapei hello! are you the right engineer to ask for a QE review on this PR?

[jhadvig]

/lgtm cancel

[yapei]

Thanks!!
LGTM

[jhadvig]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jseseCCS: This pull request references OSDOCS-13110 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead.

In response to this:

Version(s): Fix version 4.20

Issue: OSDOCS-13110

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information: I made changes to this topic: 7.1.4 PatternFly guidelines

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@jseseCCS: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[jseseCCS]

/label merge-review-needed

[dfitzmau]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #100466

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.