OSDOCS#16255: Removing unused modules from main+back #99910
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/XXL
|
🤖 Mon Oct 06 13:25:08 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
bergerhoffer
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-16255
branch
4 times, most recently
from
eb085dc to
bc9fd7c
Compare
lahinson
reviewed
Oct 2, 2025
lahinson
reviewed
Oct 2, 2025
Contributor
|
LGTM |
Contributor
michaelryanpeter
left a comment
michaelryanpeter
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I found one module that is still used by OKD. The rest of the OLM modules LGTM.
bergerhoffer
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-16255
branch
from
bc9fd7c to
e04d01b
Compare
Contributor
|
/lgtm |
Contributor
|
LGTM! |
bergerhoffer
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-16255
branch
from
e04d01b to
9fbbebb
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
@bergerhoffer: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Contributor
Author
|
Merging, since pretty much all control plane pod members signed off. |
Contributor
Author
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20 |
Contributor
Author
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
Contributor
Author
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18 |
|
@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #100040 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@bergerhoffer: #99910 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.19": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@bergerhoffer: #99910 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.18": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
This was referenced Oct 6, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
12 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Version(s):
4.12+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16255
Link to docs preview:
N/A - files are removed, so there is nothing to preview
QE review:
N/A - just removing unused module files
Additional information:
Making sure that as many control plane pod members ack this PR before merging as possible:
Followed the spreadsheet, except had to back out quite a few files that were actually in use, but missed by the script, likely because they were inside conditionals.