Skip to content

Conversation

@lnader
Copy link

@lnader lnader commented Jan 27, 2014

No description provided.

@adietish
Copy link
Member

Thanks a lot for the PR!
I filed a matching issue in our JIRA at https://issues.jboss.org/browse/OSJC-97
I'll add a simple integration and a unit test and push upstream.

@lnader
Copy link
Author

lnader commented Jan 28, 2014

Thanks. That would be great.
Lili

----- Original Message -----
From: "André Dietisheim" notifications@github.com
To: "openshift/openshift-java-client" openshift-java-client@noreply.github.com
Cc: "Lili Nader" lnader@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 9:19:31 AM
Subject: Re: [openshift-java-client] Added API to get a single cartridge (#109)

Thanks a lot for the PR!
I filed a matching issue in our JIRA at https://issues.jboss.org/browse/OSJC-97
I'll add a simple integration and a unit test and push upstream.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#109 (comment)

@adietish
Copy link
Member

Is the reasoning behind this change to be able to query deprecated cartridges? If it isn't then I'd suggest to query the cached list of cartridges instead of querying the backend

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Java Client Action Required: Pull request cannot be automatically merged

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Feb 6, 2014

@adietish @lnader what's the status on this being merged? the current jenkins plugin can't easily be built by other people until it is (have to cherry-pick in this PR).

@lnader
Copy link
Author

lnader commented Feb 6, 2014

I thought I'd wait out until Clayton changes have been merged and then test it again and see if the issue has been fixed.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Parees" notifications@github.com
To: "openshift/openshift-java-client" openshift-java-client@noreply.github.com
Cc: "Lili Nader" lnader@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 11:17:27 AM
Subject: Re: [openshift-java-client] Added API to get a single cartridge (#109)

@adietish @lnader what's the status on this being merged? the current jenkins plugin can't easily be built by other people until it is (have to cherry-pick in this PR).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#109 (comment)

@lnader
Copy link
Author

lnader commented Feb 10, 2014

Hi Ben,
It looks like with the new changes clayton pushed last week. The obsolete cartridges are returned in the list of cartridges. So there is no changes required in the openshift-java-client or jenkins plug-in.

Lili

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lili Nader" lnader@redhat.com
To: "openshift/openshift-java-client" reply@reply.github.com
Cc: "openshift/openshift-java-client" openshift-java-client@noreply.github.com
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 11:19:42 AM
Subject: Re: [openshift-java-client] Added API to get a single cartridge (#109)

I thought I'd wait out until Clayton changes have been merged and then test it again and see if the issue has been fixed.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Parees" notifications@github.com
To: "openshift/openshift-java-client" openshift-java-client@noreply.github.com
Cc: "Lili Nader" lnader@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 11:17:27 AM
Subject: Re: [openshift-java-client] Added API to get a single cartridge (#109)

@adietish @lnader what's the status on this being merged? the current jenkins plugin can't easily be built by other people until it is (have to cherry-pick in this PR).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#109 (comment)

@adietish
Copy link
Member

Hi Lili
Thanks for confirming. I'll thus most likely drop this PR and make sure we have support for variables in the url, if you agree.

@lnader
Copy link
Author

lnader commented Feb 10, 2014

Sounds good.
Lili

----- Original Message -----
From: "André Dietisheim" notifications@github.com
To: "openshift/openshift-java-client" openshift-java-client@noreply.github.com
Cc: "Lili Nader" lnader@redhat.com
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 12:18:43 PM
Subject: Re: [openshift-java-client] Added API to get a single cartridge (#109)

Hi Lili
Thanks for confirming. I'll thus most likely drop this PR and make sure we have support for variables in the url, if you agree.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#109 (comment)

@adietish
Copy link
Member

closing this PR since there's no need for this as we agreed upon having all cartridges (also the deprecated ones) in /cartridges/

@adietish adietish closed this Feb 10, 2014
@adietish
Copy link
Member

I'm PR'ing supprt for url variables in #114

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants