Skip to content

Conversation

@fabianvf
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@fabianvf fabianvf changed the title Rebase discoverer and client on the upstream implementation [WIP] Rebase discoverer and client on the upstream implementation Aug 18, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 18, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jmrodri and willthames August 18, 2021 16:07
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 18, 2021
@fabianvf fabianvf force-pushed the rebase-on-upstream branch from a7cfe1d to fceace0 Compare August 18, 2021 16:18
@fabianvf fabianvf force-pushed the rebase-on-upstream branch from fceace0 to d213b82 Compare August 18, 2021 16:27
@fabianvf fabianvf changed the title [WIP] Rebase discoverer and client on the upstream implementation [WIP] Use upstream implementation as the base, maintain only diffs Aug 18, 2021
@fabianvf fabianvf force-pushed the rebase-on-upstream branch from 29b13b7 to d5c1b71 Compare August 18, 2021 17:55
@fabianvf fabianvf changed the title [WIP] Use upstream implementation as the base, maintain only diffs Use upstream implementation as the base, maintain only diffs Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 19, 2021
from kubernetes.dynamic.exceptions import (
ResourceNotFoundError,
ResourceNotUniqueError,
ApiException,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Optional Nit: For pep8 these should be in alphabetical order, but not a big deal. If the need to be imported in this order, a comment would be nice.

tox.ini Outdated
envlist =
py{27,35}-{lint}
py{27,35}-openshift-unit
py{27,39}-{lint}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like we dont want 27 here anymore.

Copy link
Contributor

@asmacdo asmacdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 19, 2021
@fabianvf
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link

@jmrodri jmrodri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
Love code removal

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: asmacdo, fabianvf, jmrodri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 32737c0 into openshift:master Aug 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants