Skip to content

Conversation

@Xia-Zhao-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@Xia-Zhao-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

@Xia-Zhao-rh: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/7a964780-00ac-11f1-892f-2a0bc9786dc6-0

@Xia-Zhao-rh Xia-Zhao-rh changed the title UPSTREAM: <carry>: Update QE test cases to align with the removal of the redhat-marketplace catalog OCPQE-31558 Update QE test cases to align with the removal of the redhat-marketplace catalog Feb 3, 2026
@Xia-Zhao-rh Xia-Zhao-rh changed the title OCPQE-31558 Update QE test cases to align with the removal of the redhat-marketplace catalog OCPQE-31558: Update QE test cases to align with the removal of the redhat-marketplace catalog Feb 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 3, 2026

@Xia-Zhao-rh: This pull request references OCPQE-31558 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

fix failure of
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-operator-framework-olm-1212-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1/2017068525209784320

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kuiwang02
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 3, 2026
@Xia-Zhao-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 3, 2026
@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

jianzhangbjz commented Feb 3, 2026

/retitle OCPQE-31559,OCPQE-31558: Update QE test cases to align with the removal of the redhat-marketplace catalog

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title OCPQE-31558: Update QE test cases to align with the removal of the redhat-marketplace catalog OCPQE-31559,OCPQE-31558: Update QE test cases to align with the removal of the redhat-marketplace catalog Feb 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 3, 2026

@Xia-Zhao-rh: This pull request references OCPQE-31559 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

This pull request references OCPQE-31558 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

fix failure of
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-operator-framework-olm-1212-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-extended-f1/2017068525209784320

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

It failed at https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/openshift_operator-framework-olm/1217/pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-e2e-gcp-ovn/2018519832512696320

: [Monitor:audit-log-analyzer][sig-arch][Late] operators should not create watch channels very often expand_less0s{Operator "marketplace-operator" produces more watch requests than expected: watchrequestcount=39, upperbound=38, ratio=1.03  } | : [Monitor:audit-log-analyzer][sig-arch][Late] operators should not create watch channels very often expand_less | 0s | {Operator "marketplace-operator" produces more watch requests than expected: watchrequestcount=39, upperbound=38, ratio=1.03  }
: [Monitor:audit-log-analyzer][sig-arch][Late] operators should not create watch channels very often expand_less | 0s
{Operator "marketplace-operator" produces more watch requests than expected: watchrequestcount=39, upperbound=38, ratio=1.03  }

@Xia-Zhao-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verified by @Xia-Zhao-rh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Xia-Zhao-rh: This PR has been marked as verified by @Xia-Zhao-rh.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @Xia-Zhao-rh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jianzhangbjz,

About the check mentioned here: #1217 (comment) — is this a new check? If not, do you know why it’s starting to fail now when it hasn’t been an issue before?

Have you had a chance to look into it?
We need to understand why it has been raised now and not before?
If this check is not new we need to see what changes caused that.

Thanks!

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

@Xia-Zhao-rh: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, jianzhangbjz, Xia-Zhao-rh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants