Skip to content

Conversation

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 commented Oct 22, 2025

We need to use a generous timeout for these tests.
Some environments take a long time to start, and short timeouts can cause false failures.
These failures send bad signals to Sippy and, worse, can block other developers — since these tests run against every PR in the org.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 22, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@camilamacedo86: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

err := k8sClient.Get(ctx, client.ObjectKey{Name: name}, crb)
g.Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred(), fmt.Sprintf("failed to get ClusterRoleBinding %q: %v", name, err))
}).WithTimeout(10*time.Second).WithPolling(1*time.Second).Should(Succeed(), "ClusterRoleBinding %q did not become visible within timeout", name)
}).WithTimeout(2*time.Minute).WithPolling(3*time.Second).Should(Succeed(), "ClusterRoleBinding %q did not become visible within timeout", name)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This couldn't be DefaultPolling at least?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

3*time.Second => DefaultPolling

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's the = that matters

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 22, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, perdasilva

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 22, 2025
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Oct 22, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 22, 2025
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title NO-ISSUE: Define Default timeouts and apply their usage accross to avoid flakes OCPBUGS-63347: Define Default timeouts and apply their usage accross to avoid flakes Oct 22, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 22, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@camilamacedo86: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63347, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

We need to use a generous timeout for these tests.
Some environments take a long time to start, and short timeouts can cause false failures.
These failures send bad signals to Sippy and, worse, can block other developers — since these tests run against every PR in the org.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bandrade
Copy link

/label qe-approved
/verified by @bandrade

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Oct 22, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@camilamacedo86: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63347, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

We need to use a generous timeout for these tests.
Some environments take a long time to start, and short timeouts can cause false failures.
These failures send bad signals to Sippy and, worse, can block other developers — since these tests run against every PR in the org.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Oct 22, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bandrade: This PR has been marked as verified by @bandrade.

In response to this:

/label qe-approved
/verified by @bandrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 22, 2025

@camilamacedo86: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 604f94b link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 08ecdc2 into openshift:main Oct 22, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@camilamacedo86: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63347: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged:

All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63347 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

This PR is marked as verified. If the remaining PRs listed above are marked as verified before merging, the issue will automatically be moved to VERIFIED after all of the changes from the PRs are available in an accepted nightly payload.

In response to this:

We need to use a generous timeout for these tests.
Some environments take a long time to start, and short timeouts can cause false failures.
These failures send bad signals to Sippy and, worse, can block other developers — since these tests run against every PR in the org.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants