Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2018. It is now read-only.

Comments

Rest API Deployment support for passing the artifact url parameter#4078

Merged
openshift-bot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
jayjohnsonrh:rest_api_binary_deployment
Nov 6, 2013
Merged

Rest API Deployment support for passing the artifact url parameter#4078
openshift-bot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
jayjohnsonrh:rest_api_binary_deployment

Conversation

@jayjohnsonrh
Copy link
Contributor

This is the branch holding the work to get the artifact url parameter passed through on the binary deployment rest api.

@danmcp
Copy link
Contributor

danmcp commented Nov 6, 2013

[test]

@openshift-bot
Copy link

@jayjohnsonrh
Copy link
Contributor Author

[test]

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason you're limiting this to just http and https? What about ftp? I'm not sure there's really a need to test the scheme, is there?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. Added support for ftp. The purpose of the http, https, and ftp are to prevent a user from mistyping the artifact url.

…th associated tests in the broker and node. Enabling the artifact url param in the rest models.
@ncdc
Copy link
Contributor

ncdc commented Nov 6, 2013

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Online Merge Results: SUCCESS (https://ci.dev.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests/5187/) (Image: devenv_3999)

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Evaluated for online up to 73fd96c

openshift-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2013
@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit e2f739a into openshift:master Nov 6, 2013
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants