-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
Bug 2082598: Updated disruption times with higher tolerations for single node #27069
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 2082598: Updated disruption times with higher tolerations for single node #27069
Conversation
added historical values for given test names with a buffer of 5% for single node clusters Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
|
@eggfoobar: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: eggfoobar The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@eggfoobar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2082598, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/bugzilla refresh |
|
@eggfoobar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2082598, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retest-required |
1 similar comment
|
/retest-required |
|
@eggfoobar: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
|
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
|
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Reopen the issue by commenting /close |
|
@openshift-bot: Closed this PR. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@eggfoobar: An error was encountered removing this pull request from the external tracker bugs for bug 2082598 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details. Full error message.
response code 400 not 200
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
For typical single node topologies the current disruption values in 4.8 fail during upgrades, this PR adds some more generous disruption rates for only for a single node topology on
awsandazure.The values were retrieved from
ci-searchand buffered by 5.Filtered testgrid data for the tests below