Skip to content

[release-4.19] [release-4.20]: OCPBUGS-77313: Add test for CPMS OnDelete strategy with full master replacement#31054

Open
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.19from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-30882-to-release-4.19
Open

[release-4.19] [release-4.20]: OCPBUGS-77313: Add test for CPMS OnDelete strategy with full master replacement#31054
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.19from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-30882-to-release-4.19

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is an automated cherry-pick of #30882

/assign hasbro17

/cherrypick release-4.18

Creates a new test case that validates the ControlPlaneMachineSet OnDelete
strategy by deleting all three master machines simultaneously and verifying
CPMS correctly replaces them while maintaining cluster health.

The test switches CPMS to OnDelete strategy, deletes all master machines,
and validates that CPMS creates replacements with proper etcd membership
transitions. Verifies that all old etcd members are removed from both the
cluster and etcd-endpoints ConfigMap, and new members are properly integrated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered cloning bug for cherrypick for bug OCPBUGS-77313 on the Jira server at https://redhat.atlassian.net. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. request failed. Please analyze the request body for more details. Status code: 400: {"errorMessages":["QA Contact: User 'Ge Liu' is not valid for this user picker."],"errors":{"customfield_10470":"User 'Ge Liu' is not valid for this user picker."}}

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #30882

/assign hasbro17

/cherrypick release-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: aae84b7a-e48b-42ff-949c-c9e60781cc5e

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from dusk125 and sosiouxme April 22, 2026 06:53
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones 284dfa6 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@dusk125
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dusk125 commented Apr 22, 2026

/lgtm
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 22, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dusk125, openshift-cherrypick-robot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from hasbro17. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

@dusk125: The label(s) backport-risk-assessed cannot be applied or removed, because you are not in one of the allowed teams and are not an allowed user. Must be a member of one of these teams: openshift-patch-managers, openshift-release-oversight, openshift-staff-engineers, openshift-sustaining-engineers

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm
/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants