TRT-2084: comment bugs filed for terminationMessage exemptions

[sosiouxme]

After creating all the bugs to have the exemptions removed, add a comment for each one where it should be removed here.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated inline bug-reference tags across monitor test configuration entries to clarify and track known issues referenced by bug IDs, improving traceability and developer clarity in monitoring configurations.

[openshift-merge-bot]

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

[openshift-ci-robot]

@sosiouxme: This pull request references TRT-2084 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target either version "5.0." or "openshift-5.0.", but it targets "4.22" instead.

Details

In response to this:

After creating all the bugs to have the exemptions removed, add a comment for each one where it should be removed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 58c039a5-a893-4913-b991-c65488df9f6d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4feb8d9 and 517b230.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• pkg/monitortests/clusterversionoperator/terminationmessagepolicy/monitortest.go

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• pkg/monitortests/clusterversionoperator/terminationmessagepolicy/monitortest.go

---

Walkthrough

A monitoring test file is updated with inline bug-reference comments added to several OpenShift namespace entries in the existingViolations map. No functional logic, data structures, keys, or violation contents were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Inline Documentation Updates pkg/monitortests/clusterversionoperator/terminationmessagepolicy/monitortest.go	Added inline // filed OCPBUGS-<number> to fix comments to multiple namespace entries within the existingViolations map; no behavioral changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 12

✅ Passed checks (12 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: adding comments documenting filed bugs for termination message exemptions that need to be removed.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names	✅ Passed	The pull request modifies only data structure entries in monitortest.go without changing any Ginkgo test names.
Test Structure And Quality	✅ Passed	The custom check for Ginkgo test structure is not applicable; the PR only adds documentation comments to a monitor test implementation file, not Ginkgo test code.
Microshift Test Compatibility	✅ Passed	This PR does not add any new Ginkgo e2e tests. The changes only add explanatory comments to an existing monitoring test component.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility	✅ Passed	This pull request does not add any new Ginkgo e2e tests; changes are limited to inline comments in the monitor test framework file.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility	✅ Passed	This PR only adds inline comments to existing test code tracking violations in the Cluster Version Operator's terminationMessagePolicy handling. No scheduling constraints, deployment manifests, operator logic, or controller code are added or modified.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract	✅ Passed	The pull request only adds inline comments to existing code within a function method, not at the process level. No logging, print statements, or stdout-writing operations are introduced that would violate the OTE Binary Stdout Contract.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility	✅ Passed	PR does not add new Ginkgo e2e tests; only adds comments to existing monitor test code.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sosiouxme]

/test verify

[openshift-merge-bot]

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

[sosiouxme]

unrelated breakage
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

[openshift-ci]

@sosiouxme: Overrode contexts on behalf of sosiouxme: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

Details

In response to this:

unrelated breakage
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[sosiouxme]

/verified by e2e-aws-ovn-fips

[openshift-ci-robot]

@sosiouxme: This PR has been marked as verified by e2e-aws-ovn-fips.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by e2e-aws-ovn-fips

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[smg247]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: coderabbitai[bot], smg247, sosiouxme

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [smg247,sosiouxme]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@sosiouxme: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.