Skip to content

OCPBUGS-85515: Verify dynamic revision bump for etcd during kernel crash#31166

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.22from
kasturinarra:local-4.22
May 13, 2026
Merged

OCPBUGS-85515: Verify dynamic revision bump for etcd during kernel crash#31166
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.22from
kasturinarra:local-4.22

Conversation

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 13, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 465dbc27-5f21-4145-b893-08508bf0a625

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from jeff-roche and p0lyn0mial May 13, 2026 08:11
@kasturinarra kasturinarra changed the title Verify dynamic revision bump for etcd during kernel crash OCPBUGS-85515: Verify dynamic revision bump for etcd during kernel crash May 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kasturinarra: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85515, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85515 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 5.0.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Manual cherry pick of https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/30915/changes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kasturinarra: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85515, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kasturinarra: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85515, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kasturinarra: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85515, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84500 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84500 targets the "5.0.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 5.0.0
  • bug has dependents
Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented May 13, 2026

@kasturinarra: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-ipv6-recovery

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented May 13, 2026

@kasturinarra: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-ipv6-recovery

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/06dfc3c0-4eae-11f1-8820-b8a6c1af4a8e-0

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-recovery

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented May 13, 2026

@kasturinarra: trigger 3 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-recovery-1of3
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-recovery-2of3
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-recovery-3of3

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/3a6b69b0-4eae-11f1-9a26-58b1ef10be14-0

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label May 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kasturinarra: This PR has been marked as verified by https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-origin-31166-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-recovery-2of3/2054494354877190144.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-origin-31166-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-recovery-2of3/2054494354877190144

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jaypoulz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm
/approved

@jaypoulz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 13, 2026
@jerpeter1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label May 13, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@sosiouxme sosiouxme left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

})

g.It("should leave a backup container behind for debugging when etcd container crashes", func() {
g.It("should compute etcd revision bump and preserve backup container after kernel panic recovery", func() {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please note that when a test name is changed or the test is retired, the mapping should be updated so that sippy component readiness can analyze appropriately.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented May 13, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jaypoulz, kasturinarra, sosiouxme

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 13, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit ab5bb65 into openshift:release-4.22 May 13, 2026
8 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kasturinarra: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85515
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85515 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Manual cherry pick of https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/30915/changes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.