Contain exception OCPBUGS-65984 on two-node clusters#31223
Conversation
See details in [1]. We should not merge this into 5.0 if the fix for HA is not backported to 4.22. The pull can be merged only when the symptom is still there for two-node clusters after 5.1 is cut. /hold [1]. https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-65984?focusedCommentId=17095375
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: automatic mode |
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request tightens operator state transition test expectations by computing a topology flag and using it to restrict an existing ChangesTwo-Node Topology Exception Gating
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hongkailiu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
See details in [1].
We should not merge this into 5.0 if the fix for HA is not backported to 4.22. The pull can be merged only when the symptom is still there for two-node clusters after 5.1 is cut.
/hold
[1]. https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-65984?focusedCommentId=17095375
Summary by CodeRabbit