Skip to content

OCPBUGS-86763: Wait for namespace initialization before creating pod#31235

Open
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.22from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-31225-to-release-4.22
Open

OCPBUGS-86763: Wait for namespace initialization before creating pod#31235
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.22from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-31225-to-release-4.22

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is an automated cherry-pick of #31225

/assign bfournie

Fix timing issue by waiting for the 'openshift.io/sa.scc.uid-range'
annotation to be set by the namespace controller before creating the
pod.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered cloning bug for cherrypick for bug OCPBUGS-86611 on the Jira server at https://redhat.atlassian.net. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. request failed. Please analyze the request body for more details. Status code: 400: {"errorMessages":[],"errors":{"comment":"Field does not support update 'comment'","issuelinks":"Field does not support update 'issuelinks'","worklog":"Field does not support update 'worklog'"}}

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #31225

/assign bfournie

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 29, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: b776b2b8-8c1f-40e0-b015-bcf282f6d608

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from bfournie and celebdor May 29, 2026 12:40
@bfournie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retitle OCPBUGS-86763: Wait for namespace initialization before creating pod

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title [release-4.22] OCPBUGS-86611: Wait for namespace initialization before creating pod OCPBUGS-86763: Wait for namespace initialization before creating pod May 29, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 29, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86763, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.22." or "openshift-4.22.", but it targets "5.0.0" instead
  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #31225

/assign bfournie

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bfournie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 29, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bfournie: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86763, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86611 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86611 targets the "5.0.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 5.0.0
  • bug has dependents
Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bfournie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented May 29, 2026

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@bfournie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented May 29, 2026

@bfournie: The label(s) backport-risk-assessed cannot be applied or removed, because you are not in one of the allowed teams and are not an allowed user. Must be a member of one of these teams: openshift-patch-managers, openshift-release-oversight, openshift-staff-engineers, openshift-sustaining-engineers

Details

In response to this:

/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 29, 2026
@pawanpinjarkar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 29, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented May 29, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bfournie, openshift-cherrypick-robot, pawanpinjarkar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants