Skip to content

Conversation

@travier
Copy link
Member

@travier travier commented Jul 12, 2022

This should fix coreos/coreos-assembler#2919 (comment)

Fixes: c6e7dd9
Fixes: coreos/coreos-assembler#2973

@travier
Copy link
Member Author

travier commented Jul 12, 2022

/hold

This contains a change that we do not want but need to be able to test this here.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 12, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jmarrero and prestist July 12, 2022 09:34
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 12, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: travier

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 12, 2022
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

fatal: x86_64 is not supported for building dasd images

OK. I think we really need to have something like a pipeline.yaml stored in the config git, which configures the images to build. Something like this:

$ cat pipeline.yaml
images:
  all: true
  except:
    - digitalocean
    - exoscale

Then cosa buildextend-all would read that. And specifically for the dasd issue above, cosa itself already knows what images build on what platforms; we shouldn't replicate that logic in all pipelines.

@travier travier force-pushed the rhcos-cosa-ci-fix branch from 45ba13b to e1843be Compare July 12, 2022 13:16
@travier
Copy link
Member Author

travier commented Jul 12, 2022

Good idea. For now we can get away with that as this is mostly the only place where we don't build those in parallel and from the jobspec.

@travier
Copy link
Member Author

travier commented Jul 12, 2022

/retest

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

OK so, something just plain broke in CI here in fallout from some of the recent Prow rework it looks like.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

/retest

@travier
Copy link
Member Author

travier commented Jul 12, 2022

#891 will fix our immediate issue and then we can figure out the failures in this one without having other PRs blocked on it.

@travier travier force-pushed the rhcos-cosa-ci-fix branch 2 times, most recently from 3c1bb88 to bd74ac2 Compare July 13, 2022 10:58
@travier
Copy link
Member Author

travier commented Jul 13, 2022

This one took more that 3 hours to run, so we'll need to remove some tests or have them run in parallel

@travier
Copy link
Member Author

travier commented Jul 13, 2022

openshift/release#30440

@travier travier force-pushed the rhcos-cosa-ci-fix branch from bd74ac2 to cc6d6b1 Compare July 13, 2022 14:27
@travier travier force-pushed the rhcos-cosa-ci-fix branch from cc6d6b1 to 314e804 Compare July 13, 2022 16:08
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 13, 2022

@travier: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/rhcos-86-build-test-qemu 314e804 link true /test rhcos-86-build-test-qemu

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@travier
Copy link
Member Author

travier commented Jul 18, 2022

This one is still taking too long. We will probably need to setup another test job that focuses on buildextends tests.

Process did not finish before 3h0m0s timeout

@travier travier changed the title ci/prow-entrypoint: Ensure we have a qemu image for followup builds CI: Re-enable buildextend testing for COSA CI Jul 19, 2022
@travier travier marked this pull request as draft August 3, 2022 09:57
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 3, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 6, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 5, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 5, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 5, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Jan 5, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 5, 2023

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

RHCOS CI for COSA fails on cosa buildextend-aliyun

4 participants