Skip to content

Conversation

@Vincent056
Copy link

@Vincent056 Vincent056 commented Jan 27, 2026

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Cherry Pick Fix

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-4070

Does this PR have test?

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 27, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 27, 2026

@Vincent056: This pull request references CMP-3537 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add svirt_sandbox_domain and mcs_constrained_type attributes to selinuxrecording.process type to allow valid keycreate contexts.

Fixes container creation failure: "Invalid argument" on keycreate

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-3537

Does this PR have test?

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Jan 27, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 27, 2026
@Vincent056
Copy link
Author

/retest

This is to fix the failures on OCP 4.12 rhel8 node
```
oc logs pod/spod-985gr -c security-profiles-operator
runtime/cgo: pthread_create failed: Operation not permitted
SIGABRT: abort
PC=0x7f11d2de2a6c m=0 sigcode=18446744073709551610
```
@Vincent056 Vincent056 changed the title CMP-3537: Fix keycreate error in SELinux profile recording OCPBUGS-55829: Cherry Pick fix Jan 29, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 29, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 29, 2026

@Vincent056: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55829, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Closed (Done) instead
  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected [Jira Issue CMP-3674](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/CMP-3674) to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add svirt_sandbox_domain and mcs_constrained_type attributes to selinuxrecording.process type to allow valid keycreate contexts.

Fixes container creation failure: "Invalid argument" on keycreate

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-3537

Does this PR have test?

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 29, 2026

@Vincent056: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55829, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Closed (Done) instead
  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected [Jira Issue CMP-3674](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/CMP-3674) to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Cherry Pick Fix

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-4070

Does this PR have test?

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@Vincent056 Vincent056 changed the title OCPBUGS-55829: Cherry Pick fix CMP-4070: Cherry Pick fix Jan 29, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 29, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 29, 2026

@Vincent056: This pull request references CMP-4070 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Cherry Pick Fix

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-4070

Does this PR have test?

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Fix regex pattern and add missing RHEL 10 entries to all deployment
manifests. Reorder patterns to check RHEL 10 before RHEL 9. Add unit
tests for RHEL 10.1 (Coughlan) format.

Fixes operator CrashLoopBackOff on RHEL 10 nodes.
@xiaojiey
Copy link

Pre-merge verification pass.
Tried to install Compliance Operator on 4.12, 4.15, 4.19 and 4.21 rhcos10 clusters with the bundle image quay.io/redhat-user-workloads/ocp-isc-tenant/security-profiles-operator-bundle-release@sha256:7fc9c5fa7b36f420ff6b64ae5af9422c140cb7f874af2a4342ae25325fa86105, all verification pass:

$ oc get pod -l name=spod -n openshift-security-profiles
NAME         READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE
spod-4xh8l   2/2     Running   0          7m25s
spod-ch455   2/2     Running   0          7m25s
spod-cp29h   2/2     Running   0          7m25s
spod-q7qnl   2/2     Running   0          7m25s
spod-r6555   2/2     Running   0          7m25s
spod-sxhmz   2/2     Running   0          7m25s

@xiaojiey
Copy link

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Jan 30, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 30, 2026

@Vincent056: This pull request references CMP-4070 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Cherry Pick Fix

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-4070

Does this PR have test?

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link

@yuumasato yuumasato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 3, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Vincent056, yuumasato

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [Vincent056,yuumasato]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@yuumasato yuumasato merged commit 783bda7 into openshift:release-0.10 Feb 3, 2026
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. need-cherrypick qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants