Skip to content

Conversation

@cshamrick
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Scott Hamrick <2623452+cshamrick@users.noreply.github.com>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @cshamrick, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the documentation's Java SDK examples to reflect the latest version, 0.11.1. The changes focus on improving the robustness and clarity of the examples by introducing comprehensive error handling, structured logging, and dynamic retrieval of resource identifiers. These updates ensure the examples are more aligned with best practices and provide a better learning experience for users interacting with the OpenTDF platform via the Java SDK.

Highlights

  • Java SDK Version Bump: The Java SDK examples have been updated to version 0.11.1, ensuring compatibility and leveraging the latest features of the SDK.
  • Enhanced Code Examples: All Java SDK examples now include improved error handling with try-catch blocks, utilize try-with-resources for SDK instances, and incorporate Log4j for better output logging, replacing System.out.println.
  • Dynamic Resource Retrieval: Examples like create-attribute.mdx and create-subject-mapping.mdx now dynamically fetch necessary resource IDs (e.g., namespace, attribute) instead of using hardcoded values, making them more practical and robust.
  • Action Name Standardization: The Action type in get-decisions.mdx and create-subject-mapping.mdx has been updated to use setName("read") instead of setStandard(Action.StandardAction.STANDARD_ACTION_DECRYPT), aligning with current API practices.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the Java SDK examples to version 0.11.1. The changes include using a logger for output, managing the SDK client with try-with-resources for better resource handling, and implementing more robust error handling. The examples are also updated to dynamically fetch resources like namespaces instead of using hardcoded IDs. My review focuses on improving the robustness of the error handling and preventing potential runtime exceptions in the example code.

@cshamrick cshamrick marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2025 23:40
@cshamrick cshamrick requested a review from a team as a code owner December 8, 2025 23:40
@cshamrick cshamrick merged commit f67524e into main Dec 9, 2025
3 checks passed
@cshamrick cshamrick deleted the bump-java-sdk branch December 9, 2025 15:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants