Conversation
WalkthroughIntroduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for Docker health checks triggered via pull request comments, adds CI environment configuration, and includes a Docker Compose setup defining MySQL, Redis, and backend services. The e2e-test workflow is reformatted without logic changes. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
actor User
participant GitHub as GitHub Actions
participant Docker as Docker Compose
participant MySQL
participant Redis
participant Backend
participant HealthCheck as HTTP Check
participant PR as PR Comment
User->>GitHub: Comment `/cmd docker --check` on PR
GitHub->>PR: Post initial status (pending)
GitHub->>Docker: Build & start services
Docker->>MySQL: Start MySQL service
Docker->>Redis: Start Redis service
Docker->>Backend: Build & start backend
Backend->>MySQL: Wait for readiness
Backend->>Redis: Connect to Redis
rect rgb(200, 255, 200)
Note over HealthCheck: Health Check Phase
GitHub->>HealthCheck: Poll /health endpoint
HealthCheck->>Backend: HTTP request
Backend-->>HealthCheck: 200 OK
end
alt Health Check Success
GitHub->>PR: Post success status & logs link
else Health Check Failure
GitHub->>Docker: Fetch service logs
GitHub->>PR: Post failure status & full CI logs link
end
GitHub->>Docker: Shutdown services
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
template/nestJs/.env-ci (1)
4-4: Consider documenting CI-only credential usage.Hardcoded credentials (
root/rootfor database,secretfor auth) are present. While acceptable for CI environments, consider adding a comment clarifying these are CI-only values to prevent accidental production use.Also applies to: 8-8
template/nestJs/docker-compose-ci.yml (3)
1-1: Remove outdated compose version specification.The
version: "3"field is obsolete in modern Docker Compose (v2+). The Compose specification no longer requires or recommends version pinning.Apply this diff:
-version: "3" - services:
12-13: Consider using modern MySQL authentication.
--mysql-native-password=ONenables the legacy authentication plugin. Modern MySQL 8 defaults tocaching_sha2_password, which is more secure. If your application supports it, consider removing this flag or migrating to the modern auth plugin.
29-31: Add health checks to ensure service readiness.
depends_ononly ensures services start in order, not that they're ready to accept connections. Thebackservice may attempt to connect before MySQL/Redis are ready, causing startup failures.Consider adding health checks:
mysql: image: mysql:8 restart: always environment: MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD: root MYSQL_DATABASE: demo_tiny_pro ports: - "3306:3306" command: - --mysql-native-password=ON + healthcheck: + test: ["CMD", "mysqladmin", "ping", "-h", "localhost"] + interval: 5s + timeout: 5s + retries: 10 redis: image: redis ports: - "6379:6379" + healthcheck: + test: ["CMD", "redis-cli", "ping"] + interval: 5s + timeout: 5s + retries: 10 back: # ... existing config ... depends_on: - - mysql - - redis + mysql: + condition: service_healthy + redis: + condition: service_healthy.github/workflows/docker-check.yaml (1)
42-52: Consider aligning timeout strategies."Wait Service" times out at 60s, but the health check curl can retry for ~100s (20 retries × 5s). Consider documenting this two-stage wait strategy or aligning the timeouts for consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/docker-check.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/e2e-test.yml(1 hunks)template/nestJs/.env-ci(1 hunks)template/nestJs/docker-compose-ci.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.9)
.github/workflows/docker-check.yaml
26-26: the runner of "peter-evans/create-or-update-comment@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
56-56: the runner of "peter-evans/create-or-update-comment@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
72-72: the runner of "peter-evans/create-or-update-comment@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: e2e-test
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/e2e-test.yml (1)
1-46: LGTM! Formatting changes only.The workflow structure and logic remain unchanged. The reformatting improves consistency.
template/nestJs/docker-compose-ci.yml (1)
19-21: Verify dockerfile exists in template/nestJs/.The build references
dockerfile(lowercase). Ensure this file exists at the correct location with the correct filename case.
| repository: ${{ github.event.repository.full_name }} | ||
| - name: Post Initial Status | ||
| if: github.event_name == 'issue_comment' | ||
| uses: peter-evans/create-or-update-comment@v3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update action to v4 for Node.js 20 compatibility.
Based on static analysis, peter-evans/create-or-update-comment@v3 uses an outdated runner. GitHub Actions now requires Node.js 20.
Apply this diff to update all three usages:
- uses: peter-evans/create-or-update-comment@v3
+ uses: peter-evans/create-or-update-comment@v4Also applies to: 56-56, 72-72
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.9)
26-26: the runner of "peter-evans/create-or-update-comment@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/docker-check.yaml around lines 26, 56 and 72: the workflow
uses peter-evans/create-or-update-comment@v3 which is incompatible with Node.js
20; update each occurrence to peter-evans/create-or-update-comment@v4 (replace
@v3 with @v4 at lines 26, 56 and 72) so the action uses the v4 release that
supports the newer runner.
| - name: Wait Service | ||
| working-directory: ./template/nestJs | ||
| run: | | ||
| timeout 60 bash -c ' | ||
| until [[ "$(docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml ps --services --filter "status=running" | wc -l)" -ge 1 ]]; do | ||
| sleep 2 | ||
| done | ||
| ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wait condition may pass prematurely.
The check waits for at least 1 service to be running (>= 1), but docker-compose-ci.yml defines 3 services (mysql, redis, back). This could allow the workflow to proceed before all services are ready.
Apply this diff to wait for all services:
timeout 60 bash -c '
- until [[ "$(docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml ps --services --filter "status=running" | wc -l)" -ge 1 ]]; do
+ until [[ "$(docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml ps --services --filter "status=running" | wc -l)" -eq 3 ]]; do
sleep 2
done
'Alternatively, wait only for the critical back service:
timeout 60 bash -c '
- until [[ "$(docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml ps --services --filter "status=running" | wc -l)" -ge 1 ]]; do
+ until docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml ps back | grep -q "Up"; do
sleep 2
done
'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Wait Service | |
| working-directory: ./template/nestJs | |
| run: | | |
| timeout 60 bash -c ' | |
| until [[ "$(docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml ps --services --filter "status=running" | wc -l)" -ge 1 ]]; do | |
| sleep 2 | |
| done | |
| ' | |
| - name: Wait Service | |
| working-directory: ./template/nestJs | |
| run: | | |
| timeout 60 bash -c ' | |
| until [[ "$(docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml ps --services --filter "status=running" | wc -l)" -eq 3 ]]; do | |
| sleep 2 | |
| done | |
| ' |
| - name: Wait Service | |
| working-directory: ./template/nestJs | |
| run: | | |
| timeout 60 bash -c ' | |
| until [[ "$(docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml ps --services --filter "status=running" | wc -l)" -ge 1 ]]; do | |
| sleep 2 | |
| done | |
| ' | |
| - name: Wait Service | |
| working-directory: ./template/nestJs | |
| run: | | |
| timeout 60 bash -c ' | |
| until docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml ps back | grep -q "Up"; do | |
| sleep 2 | |
| done | |
| ' |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/docker-check.yaml around lines 42 to 49: the current wait loop
checks for >= 1 running service which can pass before mysql and redis are ready;
change the condition to wait for all three services by testing for >= 3 running
services (or, if only the application depends on the backend, replace the count
check with a check that the specific service name "back" is running). Update the
until condition accordingly and keep the same timeout/sleep logic so the
workflow only proceeds when the required services are up.
| - name: Shutdown Service | ||
| working-directory: ./template/nestJs | ||
| run: docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml down |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure cleanup runs even on failure.
The shutdown step lacks if: always(), so services remain running if earlier steps fail, wasting CI resources.
Apply this diff:
- name: Shutdown Service
+ if: always()
working-directory: ./template/nestJs
run: docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml down📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Shutdown Service | |
| working-directory: ./template/nestJs | |
| run: docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml down | |
| - name: Shutdown Service | |
| if: always() | |
| working-directory: ./template/nestJs | |
| run: docker compose -f docker-compose-ci.yml down |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/docker-check.yaml around lines 80 to 82: the "Shutdown
Service" step currently runs "docker compose ... down" but does not include a
condition to always run; modify the step to include "if: always()" so it
executes regardless of previous step outcome, ensuring containers are stopped
and resources cleaned up even when earlier steps fail.
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | |||
| DATABASE_HOST = 'localhost' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistent host configuration with docker-compose overrides.
DATABASE_HOST and REDIS_HOST are set to 'localhost' here, but docker-compose-ci.yml overrides them to 'mysql' and 'redis' (service names). This mismatch creates confusion and maintenance risk.
Consider setting the correct values directly in .env-ci:
-DATABASE_HOST = 'localhost'
+DATABASE_HOST = 'mysql'-REDIS_HOST = 'localhost'
+REDIS_HOST = 'redis'This makes the configuration self-documenting and reduces reliance on docker-compose overrides.
Also applies to: 10-10
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In template/nestJs/.env-ci around lines 1 to 1 (and also check lines 10-10),
DATABASE_HOST (and REDIS_HOST) are set to 'localhost' which contradicts
docker-compose-ci.yml that uses service names; update DATABASE_HOST to the MySQL
service name (mysql) and REDIS_HOST to the Redis service name (redis), remove
the unnecessary single quotes so values are the literal service names, and
ensure any other occurrences in the file (notably the referenced lines 10-10)
are updated to match.
2 participants
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
现在可以在PR下评论
/cmd docker --check来对本次PR进行docker构建与运行检查Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.