fix: test failed in the unit-test.yaml github action

[kagol]

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• CI related changes
• Documentation content changes
• Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests

  • Updated test command patterns to broaden backend test execution.
  • Added a dedicated command for running backend test coverage.

• Chores

  • Refined automated installation settings.
  • Upgraded the code formatting tool to a newer version.
  • Updated the project identifier for improved consistency.
  • Introduced a new configuration file for better workspace management.
  • Streamlined presentation of choices in project initialization.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@kagol has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 233c93b and 4f2da8a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• .github/workflows/unit-test.yaml (1 hunks)
• package.json (2 hunks)
• pnpm-workspace.yaml (1 hunks)
• src/lib/init.ts (1 hunks)
• template/nestJs/package.json (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request updates various configuration and formatting files. The GitHub Actions workflow has been modified to include distinct steps for installing pnpm and Node.js, with adjustments to the working directory and test script commands. In the root package.json, test scripts have been altered for backend specificity, and the Prettier dependency has been upgraded. Additionally, the getProjectInfo function in src/lib/init.ts has been streamlined, the package name in template/nestJs/package.json has been updated, and a new pnpm-workspace.yaml file has been added to define a workspace for package management.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
.github/workflows/unit-test.yaml	Removed the working-directory specification from the "Install depend" step, added "Install pnpm" and "Install Node.js" steps, updated pnpm version from 9 to 10, and changed test script to pnpm test:cov:backend.
package.json	Updated test scripts by modifying the glob pattern (test:**), renaming test:unit to test:unit:backend, and adding test:cov:backend; upgraded Prettier from ^1.18.2 to ^2.8.0.
src/lib/init.ts	Simplified the formatting of the choices array in the getProjectInfo function, without altering functionality.
template/nestJs/package.json	Updated the package name from nest-typescript-starter to tiny-pro-nestjs.
pnpm-workspace.yaml	New configuration file created to specify a workspace, including a packages section with the glob pattern template/*.

Possibly related PRs

• fix(ci): unit test coverage #9: The changes in the main PR and the retrieved PR both involve modifications to the .github/workflows/unit-test.yaml file, specifically related to the setup of actions for unit testing, indicating a direct connection at the code level.

Suggested labels

documentation

Poem

I'm a bunny on a coding spree,
Hopping through changes so sprightly and free,
Configs and scripts now dance in tune,
With each line twitched under the code moon,
Celebrating updates with a joyful, floppy key! 🐇

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

package.json (1)

97-97: Prettier Dependency Upgrade.
The Prettier version has been upgraded to "^2.8.0", which is a significant jump from the previous version. Ensure that any custom Prettier configurations (or integration in your CI/CD pipeline) are compatible with this newer version and that no unintended formatting changes occur.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e131e4a and e62dbad.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• .github/workflows/unit-test.yaml (1 hunks)
• package.json (2 hunks)
• pnpm-workspace.yaml (1 hunks)
• src/lib/init.ts (1 hunks)
• template/nestJs/package.json (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)

• template/nestJs/package.json
• pnpm-workspace.yaml
• .github/workflows/unit-test.yaml
• src/lib/init.ts

🔇 Additional comments (1)

package.json (1)

41-44: Enhanced Test Script Patterns and Backend Test Commands.
The updated "test" script now uses the glob pattern "test:**", which likely expands the range of matched test files to include those nested in deeper directories. Additionally, the introduction of the "test:unit:backend" and "test:cov:backend" scripts clearly distinguishes backend tests from other tests. Please verify that these changes correctly target the intended test files and do not inadvertently capture unwanted files.