[DO_NOT_REVIEW][CPU] Memory refactoring #29574
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
This PR will be closed in a week because of 2 weeks of no activity. |
Contributor
|
This PR was closed because it has been stalled for 2 week with no activity. |
Contributor
|
This PR will be closed in a week because of 2 weeks of no activity. |
Contributor
|
This PR was closed because it has been stalled for 2 week with no activity. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Details:
The main purpose of this PR is to remove dnnl dependency from the CPU plugin memory implementation. This is a necessary step toward better modularity that will help us to simplify some existing features (e.g. IO tensor sharing), but also will make it easier to implement more advanced dynamic memory reuse techniques.
Tickets: