Skip to content

Conversation

@jonathanunderwood
Copy link
Contributor

Maintainer: me
Compile tested: N/A
Run tested: N/A

Description:
@neheb persists in merging PRs without package maintainer notification and approval. I have raised this previously, but this behaviour persists. A recent PR was merged which lacks the relevant documentation updates, and with problems that should have been addressed during review, and I am not prepared to pick up the mess and continue to maintain packages when a key maintainer does not follow process.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan G. Underwood <jonathan.underwood@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan G. Underwood <jonathan.underwood@gmail.com>
@jonathanunderwood jonathanunderwood force-pushed the stubby-getdns-remove-maintainer branch from 4db283f to 791a8fb Compare June 13, 2021 14:10
@jonathanunderwood jonathanunderwood changed the title Remove maintainer from stubby and getdns packages [stubby,getdns]: Remove maintainer from stubby and getdns packages Jun 13, 2021
@jonathanunderwood
Copy link
Contributor Author

History behind this:

So, at this point, there's literally no point having package maintainers spending time on due diligence, as @neheb is just doing as he pleases, and failing to follow process everywhere.

@diizzyy
Copy link
Contributor

diizzyy commented Jun 13, 2021

I apologize and fully understand your reasoning. I've tried to get a discussion going of implementing rules and structure similar to FreeBSD's Ports Tree (outlined in FreeBSDs Porters Handbook) or alternatives to prevent issues such as this but it's hard to get things moving unfortunately.

@diizzyy diizzyy merged commit d6b1035 into openwrt:master Jun 13, 2021
@jonathanunderwood jonathanunderwood deleted the stubby-getdns-remove-maintainer branch June 13, 2021 22:26
@BKPepe BKPepe mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants