🐛 Remove creationTimestamp and status fields from webhook-operator test resources

[pedjak]

Description

Its presence has forced the BoxCutter applier to believe that resources differ from
those existing on the cluster and thus new revisions are created indefinitely on each reconcile
when trying to install webhook-operator package.

Reviewer Checklist

• API Go Documentation
• Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
• Comprehensive Commit Messages
• Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	1081521
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/6904f734f206ed00089dfc1d
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2295--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR cleans up Kubernetes manifest files by removing auto-generated and runtime fields that should not be committed to source control. These fields (creationTimestamp, empty status sections, and null spec values) are typically populated by Kubernetes at runtime.

• Removed creationTimestamp: null from CRD and ClusterRole metadata
• Removed empty status section from CustomResourceDefinition
• Removed "spec": null entries from ClusterServiceVersion example manifests

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
webhook.operators.coreos.io_webhooktests.yaml	Removed creationTimestamp field from metadata and empty status section from CRD definition
webhook-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml	Removed "spec": null entries from example resource definitions for v1 and v2 API versions
webhook-operator-metrics-reader_rbac.authorization.k8s.io_v1beta1_clusterrole.yaml	Removed creationTimestamp field from ClusterRole metadata

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.38%. Comparing base (8bda126) to head (1081521).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2295      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.28%   74.38%   +3.09%     
==========================================
  Files          90       90              
  Lines        7003     7003              
==========================================
+ Hits         4992     5209     +217     
+ Misses       1599     1385     -214     
+ Partials      412      409       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	45.85% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
experimental-e2e	48.23% <ø> (+33.63%)	⬆️
unit	58.87% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[rashmigottipati]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva, rashmigottipati

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [perdasilva]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment