✨ OPRUN-4240: Add Claude Code integration for e2e profiling

[tmshort]

Add /e2e-profile slash command to enable interactive profiling workflow through Claude Code interface.

Follow-on to #2298

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Description

Reviewer Checklist

• API Go Documentation
• Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
• Comprehensive Commit Messages
• Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign joelanford for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	d2ae505
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/690b9b4c6518670008e2f9f6
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2309--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.33%. Comparing base (18142b3) to head (d2ae505).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2309   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.32%   74.33%           
=======================================
  Files          90       90           
  Lines        7008     7014    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         5209     5214    +5     
+ Misses       1392     1391    -1     
- Partials      407      409    +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	45.89% <ø> (-0.08%)	⬇️
experimental-e2e	48.21% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
unit	58.78% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[camilamacedo86]

I think this is something we should discuss before merging.
Personally, I’d prefer that we keep our instructions AI-agnostic, rather than tied to a specific vendor or model like Claude.

For example, instead of adding a CLAUDE.md, we could introduce something like an AGENTS.md file that describes generic AI/agent usage and workflows. Then, if needed, we could create aliases or vendor-specific adapters for Claude, ChatGPT, etc. — without locking ourselves to one ecosystem.

Also, just to confirm: can every contributor actually use Claude?
Do all contributors have access to it without a paid plan?
If not, that might make a vendor-specific setup harder to maintain or may exclude contributors unintentionally.