Skip to content

Conversation

@pedjak
Copy link
Contributor

@pedjak pedjak commented Jan 14, 2026

Description

Adds optional .spec.progressDeadlineMinutes field to ClusterExtension
and ClusterExtensionRevision that defines
the maximum time an extension version can take to roll out before being marked as failed.

When configured, if a ClusterExtensionRevision fails to roll out within
the specified duration, the Progressing condition is set to False with reason
ProgressDeadlineExceeded. This signals that manual intervention is required
and stops automatic retry attempts.

Added unit and e2e test asserting the added behavior.

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 14, 2026
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a830bc8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/696e3ca59b0798000849e455
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2447--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@pedjak pedjak changed the title wip implement .spec.progressDeadlineMinutes ✨ wip implement .spec.progressDeadlineMinutes Jan 14, 2026
@pedjak pedjak force-pushed the progress-deadline-impl branch 2 times, most recently from 4dbbdd5 to 98f42da Compare January 14, 2026 17:14
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 54.83871% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 69.43%. Comparing base (dc20dfb) to head (a830bc8).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...controllers/clusterextensionrevision_controller.go 48.14% 14 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2447      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.48%   69.43%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         101      101              
  Lines        7701     7730      +29     
==========================================
+ Hits         5351     5367      +16     
- Misses       1914     1927      +13     
  Partials      436      436              
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 46.27% <0.00%> (-0.20%) ⬇️
experimental-e2e 13.50% <0.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
unit 57.07% <54.83%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@pedjak pedjak force-pushed the progress-deadline-impl branch from 98f42da to 5ed4b38 Compare January 15, 2026 17:30
@pedjak pedjak changed the title ✨ wip implement .spec.progressDeadlineMinutes ✨ Support ClusterExtension progress deadline detection Jan 15, 2026
@pedjak pedjak marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2026 17:32
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 15, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from bentito and oceanc80 January 15, 2026 17:32
@pedjak pedjak requested review from dtfranz and perdasilva and removed request for bentito and oceanc80 January 15, 2026 20:51
@pedjak pedjak force-pushed the progress-deadline-impl branch 2 times, most recently from 4eaad24 to 9788589 Compare January 16, 2026 12:17
@pedjak pedjak requested a review from dtfranz January 16, 2026 14:21
@pedjak pedjak force-pushed the progress-deadline-impl branch from 9788589 to c0a66ab Compare January 16, 2026 16:19
Adds optional `.spec.progressDeadlineMinutes` field to `ClusterExtension`
and `ClusterExtensionRevision` that defines
the maximum time an extension version can take to roll out before being marked as failed.

When configured, if a `ClusterExtensionRevision` fails to roll out within
the specified duration, the `Progressing` condition is set to `False` with reason
`ProgressDeadlineExceeded`. This signals that manual intervention is required
and stops automatic retry attempts.

Added unit and e2e test asserting the added behavior.
@pedjak pedjak force-pushed the progress-deadline-impl branch from c0a66ab to a830bc8 Compare January 19, 2026 14:16
@pedjak pedjak requested a review from perdasilva January 19, 2026 14:25
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 19, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 19, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 19, 2026
@pedjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

pedjak commented Jan 19, 2026

/override codecov/patch

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 19, 2026

@pedjak: Overrode contexts on behalf of pedjak: codecov/patch

Details

In response to this:

/override codecov/patch

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit a9e5614 into operator-framework:main Jan 19, 2026
30 of 31 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants