Skip to content

Conversation

@anpanigr
Copy link
Member

@anpanigr anpanigr commented Jul 28, 2021

Add coherence integration test with istio
The Coherence Integration Test with ISTIO works now with explicit UnicastListenAddress configuration

Ref: https://jira.****/jira/browse/OWLS-91266 ( dependent JIRA )

Also modified existing Coherance test by removing AfterAll() method

External Jenkin Result
https://build.weblogick8s.org:8443/job/weblogic-kubernetes-operator-kind-new/5833 ( Only Coherance Test )
https://build.weblogick8s.org:8443/job/weblogic-kubernetes-operator-kind-new/5836

ItIstioManagedCoherence.testIstioMultiClusterCoherenceDomain fails as the coherence cache count mismatch when ISTIO is enabled. Need to work with coherence team.

@hzhao-github
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. However, I'd suggest that we add one more test to coherence integration test with istio using managed coherence. That way, we can test istio's LBer feature by associating a Coherence Cluster with WebLogic server clusters.

ListenPort: 8100
CoherenceClusterSystemResource: CoherenceCluster
CoherenceMemberConfig:
UnicastListenAddress: 'coherence-managed-domain-cluster-1-managed-server${id}'

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought you were going to have a domainUID property here instead of hardcoding the domain id here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is a temporary workaround, till we resolve OWLS-91266. This section will be removed once we resolve OWLS-91266.

ListenPort: 8100
CoherenceClusterSystemResource: CoherenceCluster
CoherenceMemberConfig:
UnicastListenAddress: 'coherence-managed-domain-cluster-2-managed-server${id}'

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same comment as above

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is a temporary workaround, till we resolve OWLS-91266. This section will be removed once we resolve OWLS-91266.

Copy link
Member

@bhavaniravichandran bhavaniravichandran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG

@rjeberhard rjeberhard merged commit 0010a78 into main Jul 30, 2021
@rjeberhard rjeberhard deleted the coh-istio branch January 31, 2022 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants