Packages like ffmpeg-full or imagemagick-full requires a provides setting in the formular #7032
Replies: 3 comments 5 replies
|
This is intentional. |
|
That is why I think That is why my idea is a |
|
I understand the reasons for the seperation of *-full from the regular packages. What I don't understand why *-full packages are not drop-in replacements but keg-only packages with a bunch of caveats how to use them. This design decision just doesn't make sense to me. I will close this discussion, it seems debating this makes even less sense. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The idea of ffmpeg-full or imagemagick-full might be a good one but it is incomplete. Because if a package like unpaper requires ffmpeg, ffmpeg-full won't help to fullfill this requirement. So it should be possible to use ffmpeg-full or imagemagick-full as full replacement for ffmpeg or imagemagick.
And adding a provides: into the formular would make this easier.
All reactions