charmm force field #659
Unanswered
Sizhang92190
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 12 replies
|
Thanks so much for reporting this @Sizhang92190 ! Admittedly, I don't think we've tried using the charmm FFs yet, mostly because of small molecule FF compatibility issues and also I'm not 100% sure that short range shifted cutoffs are working as expected when building the hybrid topology. That being said we should definitely try to support it if we can. Do you happen to still have the error trace for the memory failure? That would help up try to work out where things are going wrong. |
1 reply
|
Something you can try to debug this issue is to use https://github.com/openmm/openmmforcefields directly to parametrize a system with charmm without having to run things through the openFE pipeline |
11 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I've been trying to use
openferecently to perform RBFE calculations on a receptor (containing an ADP residue) + a couple of ligands. Due to the presence of ADP, I've had to replace the amber force field with the charmm force field in the script,gufe/settings/models.py.However, the calculation failed in the parameterization step due to a memory issue. (It still failed even if the memory was increased.) @mikemhenry Any ideas?
Would appreciate any suggestions! If necessary, I can upload a few files later.
All reactions