REVIEW — Agent communications, authenticated notice, consent, and handoffs

[satonakaoshimoto]

Communications are not authority

A native agent may help route, summarize, draft, translate, prioritize, or respond to communications only within an explicit purpose and disclosure scope. A message, notice, signature block, verified sender, delivered packet, or agent-to-agent handshake does not by itself prove legal authority or permission to act.

M5Bank's member-controlled Notice Channel is intended to support authenticated and attributable routing without granting the sender or platform access to private M5POD contents, credentials, agents, wallets, devices, or value.

Help us review

• How should an agent prove sender, recipient, purpose, authority, and delivery state?
• What is the difference between draft, send, deliver, receive, acknowledge, accept, consent, approve, and legally effective notice?
• When must an agent stop and obtain fresh human or institutional approval?
• What metadata belongs in a privacy-filtered communication receipt?
• How should multilingual translation preserve meaning, uncertainty, and the original authoritative text?
• How should agent handoffs prevent context leakage and authority inflation?
• How do withdrawal, correction, revocation, retention, deletion, accessibility, and appeal work?
• Which communications must be routed to licensed counsel, a regulator, a court, an issuer, or another accountable professional?

Start with the M5-agent hub · Read What Is M5Bank? · Read Due Notice and Credentialed Authority

Use synthetic messages only. Do not post private correspondence, privileged material, personal contact data, or nonpublic agency communications.