Equidistant Cylindrical projection #468
Replies: 1 comment
|
Hi Federico, You're right that "Equidistant Cylindrical" isn't listed by name in Appendix F. The good news is that the CF conventions do cover your projection you just need to use the name Now, a quick heads-up about where to put this information. A lot of people try to throw a
Here's a quick example to make it clearer: Once you set it up like this, your files should pass the CF Checker just fine, and any software that reads CF-compliant NetCDF files will know exactly what to do with your data. Hope that helps! Best of luck with the work at the National Meteorological Service sounds like a really cool project. Feel free to reach out if you run into any other hiccups along the way. Kind regards |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Question
Hello,
At the National Meteorological Service of Argentina, we save radar variables in NetCDF files, which we are now trying to make CF-compliant. My question relates to the grid mapping attribute: the data is in Equidistant Cylindrical projection, but this isn't listed in Appendix F.
What is the correct way to indicate that the data is in this projection?
Kind regards
Federico
All reactions