Feature Request: Allow Wildcard Option for Ruleset Workflow and Status Checks

[wesdevpro-ssb]

Select Topic Area

Product Feedback

Body

Add a check box or a wild card character to require all status checks/workflows to pass.

[github-actions[bot]]

💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉

Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users.

Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩

• Your input will be carefully reviewed and cataloged by members of our product teams. 
  • Due to the high volume of submissions, we may not always be able to provide individual responses.
  • Rest assured, your feedback will help chart our course for product improvements.
• Other users may engage with your post, sharing their own perspectives or experiences. 
• GitHub staff may reach out for further clarification or insight. 
  • We may 'Answer' your discussion if there is a current solution, workaround, or roadmap/changelog post related to the feedback.

Where to look to see what's shipping 👀

• Read the Changelog for real-time updates on the latest GitHub features, enhancements, and calls for feedback.
• Explore our Product Roadmap, which details upcoming major releases and initiatives.

What you can do in the meantime 💻

• Upvote and comment on other user feedback Discussions that resonate with you.
• Add more information at any point! Useful details include: use cases, relevant labels, desired outcomes, and any accompanying screenshots.

As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities.

Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐

[sirandreww-starkware]

ping

[wesdevpro-ssb]

I second that 👆🏼

[giomf]

This should be a basic feature!

[wesdevpro-ssb]

And we wonder why they haven't implemented it yet 😅

[EvHaus]

Ran into this problem today and it's really frustrating. We have different CI checks that run depending on which code the PR changes. So configuring the setting as "Always make sure check A, B, and C passes" is not realistic. Sometimes checks B and C won't even run of a PR at all because they're not relevant.

We need a way to enable "Require status checks to pass before merging" with a "Whatever CI checks happen to run on that PR" without being forced to specify which ones specifically. I swear this used to be possible in the past but the UI changed recently...