Add Commenter (and Involves) to Issues/PRs filter dropdowns — search works, UI hides it #202870
Replies: 1 comment
|
Thank you for your interest in contributing to our community! We currently only accept discussions created through the GitHub UI using our provided discussion templates. Please re-submit your discussion by navigating to the appropriate category and using the template provided. This discussion has been closed because it was not submitted through the expected format. If you believe this was a mistake, please reach out to the maintainers. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Body
Problem
The Issues and Pull Requests filter bars expose Author, Label, Assignee, and Mentions as first-class dropdowns, but not Commenter (or Involves).
The search engine already supports this. From the filter box or global search you can type:
Those qualifiers work. They are documented. They are just missing from the UI that almost everyone actually uses.
That gap matters more than a convenience nit. Commenting is how most people contribute to projects they do not own. Mentions are in the dropdown; the act of participating (commenting) is not. So the product teaches users that authorship and @-mentions are real involvement, while replies and review discussion are second-class unless you already know search syntax.
Why this is essential
Finding your own work. After commenting in a busy repo (or across many repos), there is no obvious path back to those threads. Notifications only help if something new happened. Plain text search for a username does not reliably surface comments. People end up thinking the activity is gone.
Showing involvement to others. For job applications, open-source reputation, and maintainer trust, "what did this person actually do in this project?" often means comments and discussion, not only authored issues/PRs. A shareable URL like:
https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/issues?q=commenter%3AUSERNAMEhttps://github.com/search?q=involves%3AUSERNAME+repo%3AOWNER%2FREPO&type=issuesis one of the few honest ways to hand someone a contribution trail. Most developers never learn that these links exist, because the UI never offers the filter.
Parity with Mentions. If
mentions:deserves a dropdown,commenter:(and ideallyinvolves:) does too. Mentions are something done to you. Commenting is something you did. The latter is the better proxy for real participation.Requested change
On repository
/issuesand/pulls(and ideally the global Issues/PRs dashboards):commenter:USERNAME(including@me/ "Commented by you").involves:USERNAME), since that is the OR of author + assignee + mentions + commenter and is the right "overall involvement" view.Optional but valuable: a saved/default view or shortcut for "Commented by me" the way Discussions already has clearer "Commented" style filters.
Current workarounds (for readers)
These work today if you already know them:
commenter:@meorcommenter:USERNAMEin the Issues filter boxinvolves:@me/involves:USERNAMEThe bug is discoverability and product representation, not missing backend search.
Related discussions (please consolidate attention here)
These keep getting filed in different categories with little traction. Same underlying gap:
commenterfilter not highlighted likeauthorUnofficial tracker (still open after years): isaacs/github#1577
Third-party extensions (e.g. Refined GitHub) added "commented by you" shortcuts years ago because the native UI still does not.
Bottom line
GitHub already indexes comment authorship. The product just hides it behind power-user search while advertising a shorter, incomplete filter list. Please put Commenter (and Involves) in the Issues/PRs filter UI so contribution history is findable for the person who wrote it and shareable for anyone evaluating their involvement.
All reactions