Why can the up-to-date branch protection rule not be used when no other checks are used? #205606
Unanswered
detzt
asked this question in
Repositories
Replies: 1 comment
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🏷️ Discussion Type
Product Feedback
Body
In the settings it says:
I don't have any other status checks for this repository but I would still like to require feature branches to be up to date before they get merged. I understand that there is not much difference in what GitHub actually checks if a prior merge to the feature branch is required, but this encourages local testing of the integrated state instead of having the fully merged result only after it got merged into the protected branch.
All reactions