Replies: 1 comment
|
This is expected behavior from npm’s package name similarity checks. They block names that are considered too close to existing packages to help prevent typosquatting. Since Your best option would be to contact npm support and ask them to manually review the name. If they decide the packages are clearly unrelated, they may be able to allow it. Otherwise, you would need to use a scoped package such as |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🏷️ Discussion Type
Question
Body
I'd like to request review of a package-name similarity block on the npm registry.
Attempting to publish
mimify@0.0.1returns:mimifyis a distinct, long-established term (originally a Unix/Perl MIME-encoding utility), not an attempt to typosquat or impersonateminify. My package is an unrelated JavaScript library for animated widgets.I previously emailed support@npmjs.com about this (no response), then sent a follow-up that bounced due to an unrelated DNS/authentication issue on my sending domain — hence raising it here instead.
Could someone from the npm team review and allow registration of the unscoped name
mimify? Happy to provide any additional context.npm username: k8stack
All reactions