GitHub MCP Registry: how do remote servers get included? (ch.antevo/*)

[Oltramare-AI]

🏷️ Discussion Type

Question

💬 Feature/Topic Area

GitHub MCP Registry

Body

Hello,

We publish remote MCP servers in the official MCP Registry under the domain-verified ch.antevo namespace, and would like them considered for the GitHub MCP Registry (github.com/mcp). We could not find a submission path, so we are asking here: how do servers get included, and is there anything we should change on our side? For example, should each server.json carry a repository field? Our four existing entries do not yet, and we are adding one.

Listed in the official registry since August and September 2026:

• Antevo Executive Brief (ch.antevo/executive): markets, macro-economic history and world events. Public, no account. https://api.antevo.ch/mcp/executive/mcp
• Antevo Trademark (ch.antevo/trademark): checks a brand name across 50+ national and regional trademark registers. Public screening. https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp
• Antevo Wealth (ch.antevo/wealth): a household's own balance sheet, read-only, OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and dynamic client registration. https://api.antevo.ch/mcp/wealth/mcp
• Antevo Mandates (ch.antevo/mandates): an external asset manager's client book, OAuth 2.1. https://api.antevo.ch/mcp/mandates/mcp

Being published now:

• The 07:00 Brief (ch.antevo/0700-brief): a daily editorial read on markets, with a risk radar and sector notes. Public, no account. https://api.antevo.ch/mcp/0700/mcp

All of them use Streamable HTTP. Connection metadata, install links and Cursor and Gemini CLI manifests are public under MIT at https://github.com/ANTEVO-CH/antevo-mcp. The documentation is at https://antevo.ch/mcp.

Thank you,
Antevo, contact@antevo.ch

[github-actions[bot]]

Thank you for your interest in contributing to our community! We currently only accept discussions created through the GitHub UI using our provided discussion templates. Please re-submit your discussion by navigating to the appropriate category and using the template provided.

This discussion has been closed because it was not submitted through the expected format. If you believe this was a mistake, please reach out to the maintainers.