CODEOWNERS Pull Request Reviews - Random or Balanced? #53983
Replies: 2 comments
|
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
|
@will-malisch I built a small open-source extension that shows each person's open review-request count in the Reviewers menu: https://github.com/CharlieGroves/review-load - you might find it useful! |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Select Topic Area
Question
Body
I have a several repos that get automatically reviewed by our 1 list of codeowners (people on my team). It seems like the automatic process that assigns reviewers from the codeowners file is not perfectly random. It seems like there certain repo and files that typically erequest review from SME's on these repos and files.
So, does the automatic review on PR's have some sort of algorithm? Is it perfectly random? Or is it perfectly random with a balancing factor?
All reactions