copier-org
Alternative to the suffix? #2708
Unanswered
parasiteoflife
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
|
I'm not 100% sure I understand your scenario. But I'll try to give you some pointers:
Does this help? |
1 reply
|
hey, thanks for the help. I do use the subdirectory option, my problem is that if I choose an empty suffix then some .html files in the templates directory (I'm using django) will be rendered by copier and those html files use the django template language. So for example if I have this copier will try to render it and fail, right? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hey, is there a way to make copier render some files without using the suffix? I only want it to render a handful of files but adding an extension to the existing files is problematic because it messes with import paths and makes difficult to develop the templates. I was searching for an include option but it seems there is none.
Is there a way? I would assume this affects everyone, how are you doing it?
The thing is that there are some files that I do not want copier to render because they contain jinja templates specific to the template and if I remove the suffix there is no way to exclude specific files from rendering, as far as I can tell.
All reactions