Logging CFT Weekly [2026-08-18] #3192
rmaddikery
started this conversation in
Logging FT
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Participants
Agenda & Meeting Minutes
v0.9 topics
@arsibo generate a folder structure for the components log_frontend; log_backend; datarouter => folders shall be only add if a artifact for that folder is available
- proposal have two components log and datarouter. Problem the units which are realizing the component log are located in the repo logging and baselibs @arsibo: organize a meeting with Roland to discus the topic. Send out invitation in slack
11.08.2026: Meeting will take place 14:30-15:00, 11.08.2026
Meeting Notes:
Goal: Define where we should put safety documentation for mw/log interface since its functionality is split in two repositories (score_baselibs and score_logging)
Option 1 (Preferred): One safety manual for mw/log
Baselibs safety_manual could point to mw/log safety manual in score_logging
Option 2: Separate safety manual for mw/log in score_baselibs and score_logging
Option 3: Really move source code (all mw/log) to score_basleibs:
Ruled out since this creates cyclic deps which is not intended.
Option 4: Really move source code (all mw/log) to score_logging:
Ruled out since score_basleibs and score_communication cannot log(use mw/log) anymore.
Ideal to keep the documentation/artifacts close to code.
NOTE:
Create AoUs for mw/log in score_baselibs so that they can be forwarded.
Create respective AoUs in score_logging that can be forwarded to users/integrators of additional backend.
@aschemmel-tech volunteered to provide the first draft of the safety manual for mw/log as per Option 1.
Draft PR: Add safety documents for logging logging#263
04.08.2026: move content of log_rust to /score/mw/log/rust + adoptions due to process baselibs#390
@arsibo check with the process community about the usage of mw folder . mw has also a meaning of a stateful component (Markus Bechter / Andrej knows about that) => https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/contribute/general/folder.html will be updated . MW is used if it isn't only lib . It is used for runtimes. @rmaddikery please send out a PR to change https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/contribute/general/folder.html @anmittag has the latest info. regarding this and apprently its decided that "mw" can be used and the module structure will be updated (issue link to be added here)
11.08.2026: Will be discussed in the process mention on 13.08.2026
28.07.2026:
Code coverage
handling open PRs from the bot (e.g. Update dependency score_crates to v0.0.10 logging#167) @rmaddikery @anmittag tracking PRs already
add the tracing feature to logging ?? => check with @hoppe-and-dreams + decision
- Change the feature name from logging to log_and_trace
- add tracing requirement
- architecture API/component
- NOTE: https://eclipse-score.github.io/.github/#naming
feature requirements (TODO)
follow up
Info
All reactions