Use Port Range For TCP/UDP Resources

[manilx]

I have a Rustdesk server running on the VPS. Clients connect via DNS name and the network proxy (Zoraxy in this case) forwards all to an IP. No port is defined. I can't do that in Pangolin.... I requires a port.

[manilx]

How?

It's still asking me for a port, can't leave it empty.

I just reinstalled pangolin on fresh server after moving back to zoraxy after the 1st trials.

[oschwartz10612]

Oh sorry I think I misunderstood your post. Yes you still need to put in a port.

What you can do is use Pangolin to forward arbitrary udp/tcp ports to Zoraxy now though, you just need to be more deliberate about what to send instead of everything.

[manilx]

It'll be Zoraxy or Pangolin. Not both.
So what I need to proxy are:
TCP 21114-21119
UDP 21116
In zoraxy I just have an entry: rust.mydomain forwarding to the VPS IP directly.

This is what I need in pangolin also. You can now proxy TCP and UDP but I have to enter port by port (only one allowed for each resource) and then fiddle with Traefik and Gerbil docker configs.....

[oschwartz10612]

Ahh okay I understand now what you are doing. Yeah it might not make sense to run this through Pangolin and traefik then if it is on the same VPS. I misunderstood that before I apologize. If you were sending it down a tunnel then I could see the use case I guess.

[manilx]

This is how I did it and had it running just fine on Zoraxy. Zoraxy proxy and Rust on the same VPS. And in Zoraxy Rust-DNS entryjust entering the IP without ports

[d1same]

@oschwartz10612 Yes I made the TCP and UDP ports.
My setup is different though. I have the Rustdesk hosted on my homelab server at home and pangolin on a separate VPS tunnling.
The following are my setup on pangolin.
http: sub.domain.com:21115 (also tried 21116)
TCP 21115
TCP 21116
UDP 21116
TCP 21117
TCP 21118
TCP 21119

[oschwartz10612]

You dont want to make a raw http resource if you did that because it will use port 443. You just want raw TCP and UDP resources for all of the corresponding endpoints you created.

[d1same]

I just deleted the http and left the TCP and UDP still doesn't connect. trying to figure out what could be the issue.

[manilx]

Great. And not fiddling with configs would be great ;)

[oschwartz10612]

Yeah unfortunate Traefik does not allow importing EntryPoints from the dynamic config so it had to be entered into the config manually. We are thinking of adding a way to update the file from within the app or perhaps a part of the installer that will help you edit it.

[krfdoc]

It's not a huge deal to edit the configs, but a "one-liner" in the GUI to update traefik and gerbil would be pretty baller.

[manilx]

Apart from that it's working fine.

[Toylerrr]

I would love this. Making it a great proxy for game servers that get dynamically created

[hhftechnology]

traefik/traefik#1677
Not possible, because traefik doesn't allows it.

[sadorowo]

Has anything changed? I need to forward 50100-50200/udp from my Oracle VPS to my self-hosted Livekit Server (needed for Matrix calls) at home. I can't do this directly because NAT prevents me from doing this. The ideal way would be to specify port range e.g. 50100-50200 and forward each port to the client connected via tunnel, as in normal way.

At this time I can only define 100 entries in traefik config, docker compose and create 100 Pangolin resources. Wasteful, and memory & time consuming.

[MrCoala]

First of all i would like to thank you guys for such a great oss!

I am not an expert so there is just my thoughts: traefik is mainly for http related traffic? Wouldnt it be possible to utilize newt to handle the udp/tcp traffic directly? it would also eliminate one additional layer

[MexHigh]

I second this. You could accomplish this with a manual wireguard setup, so newt-only should also work without going though traefik. It also seems like the issue is stale and won't be opened again: traefik/traefik#1677