obsidian.nvim vs markdown-oxide (lsp) #717
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
|
to preface I have not used markdown-oxide extensively either but you get these:
also reference this answer: #52 (comment) In short this plugin has more scope than a markdown LSP, it works through LSP because it is more intuitive and reduce friction. So obsidian.nvim and markdown LSPs are not 1 to 1 comparable Also side note, since neovim can resolve multiple LSP servers on the same buffer, no harm enable both in a buffer to see which makes sense, you can also reference this to disable some features of obsidian.nvim and just use markdown-oxide if you find them better: |
|
markdown-oxide , provides pasting / completion . for templates i use lua snippets . and git for sync. and features like follow link , back link . unreferenced link are present in the lsp itself . |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
i am using markdown-oxide , never tried .
anyone who is willing to argue why i should change to obsidian.nvim
All reactions