You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm thinking of using Dakota's optimisation under uncertainty capabilities for the design of a piezoelectric transducer, using a 1D model. The design variables and objective function values I'm interested in are real-valued, but the model equation contains complex numbers (mixed differential-delay system function in Laplace domain, where also some of the parameter values may be complex-valued).
Can Dakota handle complex-valued variables and parameters? And if so, do gradient-based methods with analytical gradients/Hessians generally perform better than black-box type methods?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I'm thinking of using Dakota's optimisation under uncertainty capabilities for the design of a piezoelectric transducer, using a 1D model. The design variables and objective function values I'm interested in are real-valued, but the model equation contains complex numbers (mixed differential-delay system function in Laplace domain, where also some of the parameter values may be complex-valued).
Can Dakota handle complex-valued variables and parameters? And if so, do gradient-based methods with analytical gradients/Hessians generally perform better than black-box type methods?
All reactions