Independent exact-revision audit of zizmor

[icecolor78-dev]

Hi — I’m building an evidence-first GitHub repository audit project and used zizmor as an independent public demo because its own GitHub Actions security and CI setup makes it a particularly interesting subject.

I reviewed the repository only from public evidence at exact revision bb180c2.

The demo looks at things such as immutable action pinning, explicit permissions, cross-platform CI, and the repository’s own self-audit boundary, while keeping anything not established by the evidence explicitly UNVERIFIED.

Report:
https://github.com/icecolor78-dev/ai-repository-audit/blob/main/docs/demos/ZIZMOR_PUBLIC_DEMO.md

This was not requested or sponsored, and I’m not implying endorsement. I’d genuinely appreciate maintainer feedback on whether the evidence interpretation is accurate or whether anything important is missing.

[woodruffw]

I have no idea what this means. But we don't do endorsements. Please don't submit LLM comments to this project, it's against our AI policy.