Skip to content

Fix vl53 page #172

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 19, 2025
Merged

Fix vl53 page #172

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
1a02c6b
Stray div tag
dannystaple Apr 19, 2025
2b70e06
LInk to Kev's tutorial
dannystaple Apr 19, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion content/2023/01/2023-01-26-using-multiple-vl53l-type-sensors.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,7 +22,10 @@ They are small compared with the HC-SR04 distance sensors, and faster being base
The devices connect via I2C, and I2C normally allows multiple devices to share a bus, keeping pin usage low. However, one common problem for the VL53 series is that they all come with a single preprogrammed I2C address. Lets see some solutions for this.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/XQrxPcq2tZ8" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share"allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>
</div>

## Getting a single sensor working

If you are yet to get one of these working, I suggest taking a look at [Raspberry Pi Pico & VL53L0X for MicroPython](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBu6GKnN4lk) where Kevin McAleer explains how to get one of these working with a Raspberry Pi Pico.

## Simple solution - 2 I2C buses

Expand Down